Discuss a Setsumei evaluation
Tell us what your team needs to understand: an unfamiliar codebase, a consequential change, recurring code risk or a coding-agent workflow. We’ll discuss fit and a local evaluation built around one question.
Start with a high-level description. Do not send source code, credentials, or security findings by email.
Talk through the question and the next step.
A high-level question is enough to start. Discuss how your team would use the scan, browser brief or MCP queries, then agree the evaluation scope and commercial terms.
Prepare a detailed inquiry for email
Draft your message
Your email draft is ready
Send the draft to hello@syntaxa.ai using your email service. Nothing has been sent yet.
This inquiry is too long for a reliable email-app link. Copy it into your email service or download the draft, then send it to hello@syntaxa.ai.
What your team will evaluate.
Choose one question to test the product’s fit for recurring work. Evaluate the usefulness of the analysis, whether the results are inspectable, and how practical it is to refresh and reuse them.
Agree what a useful evaluation would answer.
Discuss the result your team needs and how you would judge it. Source/build details and relevant participants help plan the work; they are not prerequisites for an inquiry.
- Did the results help answer the chosen question?
- Could engineers inspect important relationships and unknowns?
- Was setup, analysis refresh and reuse practical for the team?
Agree on the software fit and evaluation terms.
Agree software fit, local prerequisites, evaluation scope, price, and schedule in written commercial terms before committing.